Editorial Policy

People-first publication test

A proposed page must help a visitor make or explain a real decision. A keyword variation, paper size, orientation, or color alone is not enough reason for another indexable URL; those choices belong inside the creator or a consolidated format guide.

Sources and claim boundaries

Primary, government, public-health, and official method-owner sources are preferred for factual context. Practical examples are labeled as examples. ADHD pages separate organizational suggestions from diagnosis or treatment and link supported claims near the relevant section.

AI assistance and accountability

AI may help organize drafts, compare wording, or identify missing checks. It is not listed as an author and does not replace organizational responsibility. Pages are rejected when they merely paraphrase common material, repeat a sitewide template, or manufacture credentials and experience.

Updates and corrections

Publication dates record first release. Modification dates change after substantive visible edits, not routine builds. Correction requests can be sent through the Contact page and are evaluated against the current product behavior and cited source.

Questions about Editorial Policy

Does the editorial policy allow AI-assisted writing?

Yes, as an assistive drafting or checking tool. Eisenhower Matrix PDF Editorial remains responsible for the published result, source accuracy, visible limitations, and corrections.

How are corrections handled under this editorial policy?

Material factual, source, privacy, or product-behavior errors are corrected promptly. The modification date changes only when the visible page receives a meaningful editorial update.